PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus H170M-E D3 (all builds) |
Memory | 10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20180222 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Oct 06 '19 at 17:11 |
Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
31.8%
Below average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.7.5
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
20.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$99
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 273 234 128 75 56 MB/s
|
69.3%
Good
|
|||
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
122GB free
Firmware: CXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-6400Intel $62Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 68x |
Core i7-6700Intel $150Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 61x |
Core i5-6600Intel $246Bench 68%, 80,688 samples | 59x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 45x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 29x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 28x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |