Asus H170M-E D3

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H170M-E D3 (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180222
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 03 '19 at 17:40
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	39.5% Below average	Memory 64.4 1-Core 25.3 2-Core 50.8 33% 46.8 Pts	4-Core 81.9 8-Core 139 13% 110 Pts	64-Core 140 9% 140 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Asus(1043 04E3) CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.7.5 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	20.7% Poor	Lighting 16.7 Reflection 35.7 Parallax 53.9 14% 35.4 fps	MRender 50.7 Gravity 42.3 Splatting 36.4 35% 43.1 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 255 253 251 256 181 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Read 445 Write 424 Mixed 359 SusWrite 244 83% 368 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 39.6 4K Mixed 31 102% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 172 130% 175 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 118%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 124GB free Firmware: CXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,432 Write 1,188 Mixed 715 246% 1,112 MB/s	4K Read 37 4K Write 55.2 4K Mixed 40.4 137% 44.2 MB/s	DQ Read 228 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 198 151% 204 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. G.SKILL F3-14900CL9-4GBSR BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. G.SKILL F3-14900CL9-4GBSR 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	46.2% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 18.8 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 8.3 23% 8.1 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H170M-E D3 Builds (Compare 409 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-E D3

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $69Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	65x
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	57x
Core i5-6600Intel $115Bench 68%, 80,688 samples	57x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	28x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	27x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	11x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	26x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	13x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 5,347 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $97

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16