Acer Aspire M5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire M5810  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer FMP55
Memory3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090829
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 05 '19 at 19:53
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 70.4
2-Core 141
63% 101 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 276
35% 264 Pts
64-Core 275
17% 275 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Sapphire(174B E164) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.09% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 1.73
Parallax 1.59
1% 1.55 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.52
1% 1.32 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.09%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 230 232 234 234 235 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
74.4% Very good
Read 257
Write 238
Mixed 245
SusWrite 231
55% 243 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 40.4
131% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 178
140% 193 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 123%
WD VelociRaptor 250GB-$35
205GB free
Firmware: 04.06A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 172 171 172 173 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 165
Mixed 93.2
SusWrite 172
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.7
353% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 100%
Great: 111%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
542GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 74 72 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 67.6
Write 71.8
Mixed 47.3
SusWrite 73.1
48% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 57%
SAMSUNG 64GB
58GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 12 5.4 8.2 4.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.02% Terrible
Read 14.8
Write 2
Mixed 14
SusWrite 9.3
13% 10 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.2
54% 1.6 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GU512303EP0202 None GU502203EP0201 None GU512303EP0202 None GU502203EP0201 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
42.8% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 14.8
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 11.4
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M5810 Builds (Compare 114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Acer Aspire M5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $131
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback