Asrock FM2A88X+ Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive85.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88X+ Killer  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160517
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 05 '19 at 11:51
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 82
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 139
59% 97.6 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 222
30% 224 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
ASRock(1849 130F) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.9.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.42% Terrible
Lighting 11.8
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 15.3
10% 12.7 fps
MRender 9.67
Gravity 11.1
Splatting 12
9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.42%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 439 235 151 152 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 456
Write 445
Mixed 381
SusWrite 256
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 85.5
4K Mixed 36.7
133% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 254
186% 241 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
895GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 122 123 123 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 116
Write 114
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 122
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
46.6% Average
MC Read 21
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 19.1
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 14.3
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A88X+ Killer Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88X+ Killer - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $437
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback