Asrock FM2A88X+ Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive84.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88X+ Killer  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160517
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '19 at 21:38
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 76.5
1-Core 66.1
2-Core 128
55% 90.1 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 196
27% 202 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
ASRock(1849 130F) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.9.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9% Terrible
Lighting 11.3
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 15.2
9% 12.3 fps
MRender 8.76
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 11.1
9% 10.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 430 258 151 149 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 457
Write 454
Mixed 382
SusWrite 255
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 81.8
4K Mixed 36
129% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 252
185% 240 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
895GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 123 120 123 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 111
Write 110
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 122
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2132 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.9% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 16.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 11.3
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A88X+ Killer Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88X+ Killer - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $437
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback