Samsung PNEKB09F Samsung DeskTop

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive69.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung PNEKB09F Samsung DeskTop  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG DM500T7Z-AD3A
Memory6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171024
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 05 '19 at 05:33
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 105
2-Core 206
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 403
50% 380 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Sanyo(144D B09F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4590
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
6.23% Terrible
Lighting 6.57
Reflection 9.65
Parallax 6.34
5% 7.52 fps
MRender 8.14
Gravity 5.27
Splatting 13.9
8% 9.11 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.23%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P3-256 256GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H180516
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 104 106 104 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 454
Write 104
Mixed 156
SusWrite 104
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 35.3
119% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 97.5
DQ Mixed 144
116% 170 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 98%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
410GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 128 127 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 124
Write 123
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 127
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851U6AFR6N-UH Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
61.3% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 16.8
64% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 14.6
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PNEKB09F Samsung DeskTop Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Samsung PNEKB09F Samsung DeskTop

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback