HP 870-260na

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 870-260na  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F1
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190524
Uptime20.2 Days
Run DateOct 03 '19 at 19:28
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 105
2-Core 210
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 422
54% 412 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 436.48
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 23
Parallax 18.6
16% 20.5 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 19.8
Splatting 25.9
20% 24.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Drevo X1 Pro 512GB
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0423A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 380 60 34 97 212 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 429
Write 385
Mixed 353
SusWrite 194
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 17.7
112% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 96.5
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 23.8
72% 148 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
825GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 163 165 164 164 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 140
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 164
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
ST350031 2CS 500GB
410GB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 42 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
20% Poor
Read 39.3
Write 38.7
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 41.2
50% 36.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20%
Great: 20%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 2TB
941GB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 108 100 102 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 106
Write 108
Mixed 68
SusWrite 103
130% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (82nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.8% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 11.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.8
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870-260na Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: HP 870-260na

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback