HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150915
Uptime18 Days
Run DateOct 01 '19 at 16:32
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 198
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 500
52% 419 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Asus(1043 0443) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
6.39% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 8.12
Parallax 7.78
7% 8.13 fps
MRender 6.57
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 6.57
5% 6.51 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.39%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480 GB 480GB
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 3.8 4.3 21 43 111 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.4% Below average
Read 237
Write 209
Mixed 175
SusWrite 31.2
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 24.9
4K Mixed 13.6
54% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 47.9
DQ Mixed 41
40% 65.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 57%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 102 104 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 139
Write 127
Mixed 90.4
SusWrite 102
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
459GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 128 129 129 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 147
Write 142
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 128
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 32GB
29GB free, PID 5597, sandisk cruzer glide 32gb
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 7.1 7.8 8.7 8 8.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 14.7
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 8.1
22% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.4
151% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-034.A00LF Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.4% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.8
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 10.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 SFF Builds (Compare 3,132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback