Apple iMac17,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemApple iMac17,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-B809C3757DA9BB8D
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190411
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateSep 30 '19 at 20:23
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$134
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 112
2-Core 210
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 448
59% 443 Pts
64-Core 431
27% 431 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RADEON R9 M395
Apple(106B 014C) 2GB
CLim: 834 MHz, MLim: 1365 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.6.1
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.2% Poor
Lighting 33.6
Reflection 37.7
Parallax 33.2
27% 34.8 fps
MRender 41
Gravity 31.9
Splatting 27.7
27% 33.5 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$235
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 397 399 405 405 372 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 447
Write 417
Mixed 410
SusWrite 397
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 27.5
123% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 328
248% 335 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 133%
Lacie P9227 Slim 1TB
236GB free
Firmware: 1153
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 41 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 37.3
Write 41
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 40.4
28% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.7
197% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x384B54463531323634485A2D314739453220 0x198 0x4B48583138363643313153334C2F34472020 0x802C 0x384B54463531323634485A2D314739453220 0x198 0x4B48583138363643313153334C2F34472020 16GB
1867, 1867, 1867, 1867 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.3% Good
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 20.3
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 21.8
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac17,1 Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac17,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback