Apple iMac17,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemApple iMac17,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-B809C3757DA9BB8D
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190411
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 19 '19 at 19:48
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$134
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 109
2-Core 218
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 431
57% 429 Pts
64-Core 439
27% 439 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RADEON R9 M395
Apple(106B 014C) 2GB
CLim: 834 MHz, MLim: 1365 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.6.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.6% Poor
Lighting 33.9
Reflection 37.6
Parallax 33.1
28% 34.9 fps
MRender 41.3
Gravity 33.1
Splatting 28.7
28% 34.3 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$235
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 391 395 394 395 394 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 442
Write 394
Mixed 322
SusWrite 393
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 60.5
4K Mixed 24
93% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 260
216% 310 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 133%
Lacie P9227 Slim 1TB
219GB free
Firmware: 1153
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 90 90 89 90 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 67
Write 106
Mixed 55
SusWrite 88.6
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.6
173% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x384B54463531323634485A2D314739453220 0x198 0x4B48583138363643313153334C2F34472020 0x802C 0x384B54463531323634485A2D314739453220 0x198 0x4B48583138363643313153334C2F34472020 16GB
1867, 1867, 1867, 1867 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.5% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 19.2
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 18.6
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac17,1 Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac17,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback