Apple iMac17,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemApple iMac17,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-B809C3757DA9BB8D
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190411
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateSep 04 '19 at 18:10
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$134
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 113
2-Core 226
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 448
59% 442 Pts
64-Core 425
26% 425 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RADEON R9 M395
Apple(106B 014C) 2GB
CLim: 834 MHz, MLim: 1365 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.6.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.5% Poor
Lighting 33.8
Reflection 37.6
Parallax 33.2
28% 34.9 fps
MRender 41.2
Gravity 33.1
Splatting 28.7
28% 34.3 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$235
237GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 400 400 398 399 399 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 449
Write 402
Mixed 399
SusWrite 400
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 33
128% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 319
244% 331 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 133%
Lacie P9227 Slim 1TB
129GB free
Firmware: 1153
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 66 68 69 67 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 97.7
Write 98.8
Mixed 92
SusWrite 66
66% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.7
179% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x384B54463531323634485A2D314739453220 0x198 0x4B48583138363643313153334C2F34472020 0x802C 0x384B54463531323634485A2D314739453220 0x198 0x4B48583138363643313153334C2F34472020 16GB
1867, 1867, 1867, 1867 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.2% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 20.1
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 20.5
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac17,1 Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac17,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback