Asrock Z270M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics98.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z270M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory19.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '19 at 10:34
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 121
2-Core 286
91% 167 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 800
78% 642 Pts
64-Core 805
50% 805 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.3% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 140
Parallax 118
101% 127 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 129
Splatting 104
92% 114 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,077
Write 1,440
Mixed 547
297% 1,355 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 56.6
236% 93.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,055
DQ Write 1,173
DQ Mixed 768
674% 999 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$70
262GB free
Firmware: X61170RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 373
Write 211
Mixed 272
63% 285 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 32
122% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 284
232% 330 MB/s
Poor: 70% Great: 119%
Lexar SSD 240GB
190GB free
Firmware: R1009A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 471
Write 421
Mixed 364
93% 418 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 91.6
4K Mixed 26.9
139% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 35.1
70% 138 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 168%
Kingston SKC2000M8250G 250GB
104GB free
Firmware: S2681101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,538
Write 1,069
Mixed 193
273% 1,266 MB/s
4K Read 59.9
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 82.2
295% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 591
DQ Write 493
DQ Mixed 393
335% 492 MB/s
Poor: 145% Great: 276%
Kingdian S500 120GB
111GB free
Firmware: Q0202A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 507
Write 358
Mixed 370
91% 412 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 50.5
177% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 92.3
136% 255 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 156
Write 118
Mixed 70.5
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
478% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
360GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 94.3
Write 63.5
Mixed 74
58% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16/8G 029E CMK8GX4M2A2666C16 KHX2666C16/8G 029E CMK8GX4M2A2666C16 24GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.8% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 26.1
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 34
SC Mixed 26
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270M Pro4 Builds (Compare 444 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock Z270M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $652
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback