Dell XPS 8900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics79.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell XPS 8900  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0XJ8C4
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160120
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateNov 10 '16 at 19:31
Run Duration341 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 84.4
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 225
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 638
67% 537 Pts
64-Core 649
40% 649 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7570
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.5% Very good
Lighting 98.4
Reflection 111
Parallax 104
80% 105 fps
MRender 94.3
Gravity 92.8
Splatting 98.1
78% 95.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PC512HAGH-000 512GB
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM0101Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 498
Write 380
Mixed 438
98% 439 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 13.9
92% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 79.7
DQ Mixed 50
66% 124 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
645GB free
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 183
Mixed 173
137% 182 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.24
100% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 78.4
Write 76.1
Mixed 76.7
99% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.43
4K Mixed 0.15
56% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 49%
Plugable USB3-SATA-U3 500GB
14GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 58.3
Write 45.6
Mixed 48.7
63% 50.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.32
79% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 36%
ST320006 44NS 2TB
2GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.3% Average
Read 94.9
Write 95.9
Mixed 64.6
107% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.54
93% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 43%
Generic- Compact Flash 2GB
1GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
4.52% Terrible
Read 11.9
Write 7.91
Mixed 9.81
12% 9.86 MB/s
4K Read 4.11
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.03
18% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.52%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
75.1% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 23.9
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 23.1
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8900 Builds (Compare 2,797 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback