MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics59.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B98
MotherboardMSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190117
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateSep 26 '19 at 05:27
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 151
2-Core 296
99% 180 Pts
4-Core 600
8-Core 1,161
104% 881 Pts
64-Core 1,153
71% 1,153 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.4% Above average
Lighting 73.7
Reflection 75.8
Parallax 66.3
60% 72 fps
MRender 71.5
Gravity 69.3
Splatting 71.5
58% 70.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$46
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 134 116 59 95 56 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 264
Mixed 324
SusWrite 114
67% 303 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 53.1
194% 72 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 270
220% 314 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49
275GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 437 432 316 439 439 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 437
Mixed 335
SusWrite 417
94% 421 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 46.2
169% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 208
176% 254 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 110%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$46
206GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 194 193 194 194 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 479
Mixed 342
SusWrite 218
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 54.1
199% 74.3 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 274
226% 324 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 111%
Great: 105%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 170 168 172 170 170 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 162
Mixed 106
SusWrite 170
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
250% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 106%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
79.6% Very good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 22.9
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 24.5
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) Builds (Compare 32,500 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) - $262

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $857
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback