Asus X99-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	23.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-PRO (all builds)
Memory	25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141016
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '19 at 18:41
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Memory 87 1-Core 94.5 2-Core 183 71% 121 Pts	4-Core 315 8-Core 568 53% 441 Pts	64-Core 721 45% 721 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153 39,178 User benchmarks, average bench 21% XFX(1682 2015) CLim: 995 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	23.6% Poor	Lighting 27.9 Reflection 32.1 Parallax 34.5 23% 31.5 fps	MRender 28.9 Gravity 23 Splatting 37.6 25% 29.8 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 23%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 EVO 250GB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 255GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 214 220 216 226 228 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 474 Write 305 Mixed 386 SusWrite 222 78% 347 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 36.3 4K Mixed 26.9 96% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 295 DQ Write 212 DQ Mixed 292 208% 266 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 123%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 83GB free Firmware: EXT0CB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 207 226 223 231 233 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Read 478 Write 422 Mixed 376 SusWrite 222 84% 374 MB/s	4K Read 36.1 4K Write 35.1 4K Mixed 32.4 115% 34.5 MB/s	DQ Read 246 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 206 164% 229 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 118%
Crucial MX200 1TB-$270 3,707 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 121GB free Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 195 133 157 126 125 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Read 398 Write 348 Mixed 316 SusWrite 146 68% 302 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 36.2 4K Mixed 25.6 90% 29 MB/s	DQ Read 133 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 114 105% 157 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 104%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 90GB free Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 223 234 232 237 233 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Read 481 Write 394 Mixed 328 SusWrite 232 80% 359 MB/s	4K Read 38.5 4K Write 38.4 4K Mixed 34.3 123% 37.1 MB/s	DQ Read 273 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 273 193% 246 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 123%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 164GB free Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 218 225 216 234 236 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Read 472 Write 423 Mixed 400 SusWrite 227 85% 380 MB/s	4K Read 36.8 4K Write 36.7 4K Mixed 30.8 115% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 143 106% 143 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 124%
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB 4,943 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1TB free Firmware: 0708 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 107 112 112 112 112 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	57.5% Above average	Read 90 Write 98 Mixed 97.7 SusWrite 110 74% 98.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.6 162% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 64%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 3,591 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 451GB free, PID b207 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 97 96 96 96 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Read 147 Write 140 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 93.6 126% 99.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 40% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GB-$140 4,858 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	98% Outstanding	MC Read 36.1 MC Write 41.3 MC Mixed 36.7 109% 38 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 19.7 48% 17 GB/s	Latency 70.5 57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 120%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-PRO Builds (Compare 371 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 66%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 59%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO - $320

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	225x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	86x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	39x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	38x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	26x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	18x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GBKingstonBench 90%, 4,583 samples	13x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $117Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	10x
BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FA 4x8GBCrucialBench 107%, 871 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $1,104

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16