Asus X99-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	23.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-PRO (all builds)
Memory	25 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141016
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '19 at 18:34
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 86.4 1-Core 94.3 2-Core 185 71% 122 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 567 54% 444 Pts	64-Core 720 45% 720 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153 39,178 User benchmarks, average bench 21% XFX(1682 2015) CLim: 995 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	23.6% Poor	Lighting 27.9 Reflection 32 Parallax 37.5 23% 32.4 fps	MRender 28.9 Gravity 23.1 Splatting 37.7 25% 29.9 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 23%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 EVO 250GB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 255GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 223 229 217 229 234 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 489 Write 407 Mixed 405 SusWrite 224 85% 381 MB/s	4K Read 38.4 4K Write 36.9 4K Mixed 34.1 121% 36.5 MB/s	DQ Read 303 DQ Write 213 DQ Mixed 299 212% 271 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 123%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 83GB free Firmware: EXT0CB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 215 229 223 234 238 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Read 478 Write 277 Mixed 314 SusWrite 222 72% 323 MB/s	4K Read 36.8 4K Write 34.5 4K Mixed 32.1 115% 34.5 MB/s	DQ Read 254 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 218 170% 233 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 118%
Crucial MX200 1TB-$270 3,707 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 121GB free Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 144 126 170 134 132 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Read 375 Write 406 Mixed 287 SusWrite 153 68% 305 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 37.6 4K Mixed 26.9 93% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 84.1 DQ Write 227 DQ Mixed 127 105% 146 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 104%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 90GB free Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 230 233 208 208 192 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Read 481 Write 425 Mixed 339 SusWrite 214 82% 365 MB/s	4K Read 38.9 4K Write 38.2 4K Mixed 34.2 123% 37.1 MB/s	DQ Read 276 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 271 191% 243 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 123%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 164GB free Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 223 229 223 232 239 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Read 475 Write 409 Mixed 368 SusWrite 227 83% 370 MB/s	4K Read 36.2 4K Write 35.7 4K Mixed 30.1 112% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 141 106% 143 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 124%
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB 4,943 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1TB free Firmware: 0708 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 111 112 112 112 115 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	58.2% Above average	Read 92 Write 105 Mixed 98 SusWrite 110 75% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.6 167% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 64%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 3,591 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 451GB free, PID b207 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 89 96 96 96 96 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	43.8% Average	Read 147 Write 149 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 94.3 130% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.4 36% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GB-$140 4,858 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	97.6% Outstanding	MC Read 35.5 MC Write 41.3 MC Mixed 36.9 108% 37.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 19.2 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 70.9 56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 97.6% Great: 120%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-PRO Builds (Compare 370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 66%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 59%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO - $320

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	224x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	86x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	39x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	38x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	26x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	18x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GBKingstonBench 90%, 4,583 samples	13x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $98Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	10x
BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FA 4x8GBCrucialBench 107%, 871 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $1,119

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16