TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory5.9 GB free of 10.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100913
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 18 '19 at 22:49
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3690-$990
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 94.3
1-Core 104
2-Core 209
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 666
66% 541 Pts
64-Core 762
47% 762 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑
This bench: 85.8%
 Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 2974)
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1900 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.68
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Lighting 73.4
Reflection 70
Parallax 69
60% 70.8 fps
MRender 63.7
Gravity 71.1
Splatting 62.4
54% 65.7 fps
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 57.7%
 Great: 54%
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 361C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.68
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Lighting 35.1
Reflection 31.4
Parallax 40.8
29% 35.8 fps
MRender 44
Gravity 45.7
Splatting 38.8
35% 42.8 fps
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 30.6%
 Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 50 56 61 78 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 65.3
Write 73.8
Mixed 46
SusWrite 63.6
46% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 37%
 Great: 74%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40
237GB free
Firmware: ES2OA70K
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 60 62 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 77.3
Write 76.7
Mixed 41.8
SusWrite 61.8
47% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑
This bench: 39.9%
 Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB ID:80 AD F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 44GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.4% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 8.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 10.9
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 58.9
68% 58.9 ns
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 33.4%
 Great: 33%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,348 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

CPU
Xeon W3520Intel  $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples570x
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples539x
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples492x
GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples277x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples157x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples138x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples137x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples74x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples66x
RAM
ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 42GBUnknownBench 37%, 128 samples22x
ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 46GBUnknownBench 45%, 108 samples18x
ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 46GBUnknownBench 46%, 280 samples17x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback