Asus PRIME X570-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-PRO  (all builds)
Memory19.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '19 at 23:27
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Memory 83
1-Core 148
2-Core 294
94% 175 Pts
4-Core 563
8-Core 924
91% 743 Pts
64-Core 1,375
85% 1,375 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 94%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 92.4
Parallax 186
96% 132 fps
MRender 90.5
Gravity 128
Splatting 131
97% 117 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 133 135 136 140 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 431
Mixed 361
SusWrite 150
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 51.8
172% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 202
152% 204 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 EVO 250G 250GB
181GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 437 400 296 286 289 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 424
Mixed 399
SusWrite 345
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 51.6
169% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 203
153% 204 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 102%
Great: 122%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
169GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 437 436 432 388 404 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 422
Mixed 401
SusWrite 410
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 53.6
158% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 202
153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 104%
Great: 133%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
114GB free
Firmware: CXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 160 156 166 161 161 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 454
Write 152
Mixed 178
SusWrite 161
52% 236 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 20.5
79% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 53.2
DQ Mixed 88.6
74% 112 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 76%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
117GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 317 317 319 310 314 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 372
Write 366
Mixed 322
SusWrite 320
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 49.6
161% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 203
152% 204 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HUS 724030ALA640 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: MF8O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 70 83 93 72 83 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 157
Write 146
SusWrite 80.7
91% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.3
112% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 94%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 156 154 160 153 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 104
Write 95.5
Mixed 26
SusWrite 153
68% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.5
179% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 88%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 164 173 169 162 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 156
Write 170
Mixed 109
SusWrite 166
205% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.2
214% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 86%
ELEGANT ISOSTICK FLASH 64GB
12GB free, PID 0001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 7.5 6.6 6.8 7.3 7.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
6.84% Terrible
Read 9.8
Write 7.3
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 7.2
11% 8.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 2.9
146% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.84%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$128
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 36.4
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 31.7
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-PRO Builds (Compare 5,389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,245
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback