ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming GT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming GT (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140531
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 04 '15 at 16:36
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50 229,359 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 126 2-Core 261 87% 194 Pts	4-Core 505 8-Core 502 67% 504 Pts	64-Core 506 31% 506 Pts
Poor: 53% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 2847) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4788 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Lighting 32.2 Reflection 29.6 Parallax 35.4 26% 32.4 fps	MRender 40 Gravity 29.4 Splatting 32.9 28% 34.1 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 146GB free Firmware: 580A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 4556991 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 -125670743079742 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 117 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 42 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 21 26 60131246101 (C2) HDA temperature 21 26 60131246101 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4556991 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4556991 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4556991 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 8589934592 (E9) Unknown 0 0 900 (EA) Unknown 0 0 406 (F1) Unknown 0 0 406 (F2) Unknown 0 0 215	89.4% Excellent	Read 507 Write 249 Mixed 271 75% 342 MB/s	4K Read 39.7 4K Write 133 4K Mixed 18.6 154% 63.7 MB/s	DQ Read 213 DQ Write 238 DQ Mixed 74 98% 175 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 94%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139 17,545 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 5 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 3144 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 421 (A7) Unknown 100 100 34 (A8) Unknown 100 100 220 (A9) Unknown 100 100 479 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 98 (AE) Unknown 100 100 75 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 82 41 176094380050 (D4) Unknown 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 794 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 794 (F1) Unknown 253 253 15701491686 (F2) Unknown 253 253 29685440954 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	90.9% Outstanding	Read 453 Write 364 Mixed 307 83% 375 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 21.4 138% 57.1 MB/s	DQ Read 285 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 53.8 89% 174 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 99%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA330 1TB 8,831 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 759GB free Firmware: JP4O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 98 98 65540 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 95 (03) Spinup time 129 129 25790120211 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 155 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 132 132 34 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1370 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 152 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 156 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 156 (C2) HDA temperature 206 206 180389609501 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	46.9% Average	Read 94.1 Write 69.4 Mixed 66 57% 76.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.38 94% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 76%
Samsung HD403LJ 400GB-$183 4,107 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 235GB free Firmware: CT10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7552 (04) Start/Stop count 75 75 25965 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 27684 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3169 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 43557 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 1 (BC) Unknown 88 88 1227 (BE) vendor-specific 74 48 26 (C2) HDA temperature 160 82 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 43557 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 25 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	30.4% Below average	Read 53.6 Write 52.1 Mixed 52.1 40% 52.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 0.99 4K Mixed 0.3 70% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GA-Z97X-Gaming GT Builds (Compare 177 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation

Workstation 54%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming GT - $300

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	90x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	32x
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	18x
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	17x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	14x

SSD
EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 120GBHP $33Bench 139%, 2,425 samples	11x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $160Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	9x
S650 240GBHPBench 75%, 488 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 2133 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 55%, 993 samples	8x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GBKingstonBench 57%, 3,744 samples	7x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $959

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback