Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming GT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics26.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming GT  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '15 at 08:53
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 128
2-Core 257
87% 193 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 518
69% 515 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 53% Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
MSI(1462 2847) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4752
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Lighting 32.4
Reflection 29.7
Parallax 40.8
26% 34.3 fps
MRender 40
Gravity 29.6
Splatting 33.2
28% 34.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 439
Write 331
Mixed 356
83% 375 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 23.6
142% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 52.9
89% 176 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 99%
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
97GB free
Firmware: 580A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 283
Mixed 364
85% 384 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 18.8
159% 65.2 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 80.4
108% 194 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 94%
Great: 94%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA330 1TB
591GB free
Firmware: JP4O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 84.7
Write 80
Mixed 78.6
61% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.23
4K Mixed 0.28
66% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 76%
Samsung HD403LJ 400GB-$183
240GB free
Firmware: CT10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 50.9
Write 61.7
Mixed 53
42% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.35
85% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 42%
Typical GA-Z97X-Gaming GT Builds (Compare 177 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming GT - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $959
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback