Asus H81M-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-A  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150309
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 10 '19 at 20:18
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
32.3% Below average
Memory 43.5
1-Core 32.1
2-Core 68.9
30% 48.2 Pts
4-Core 119
8-Core 145
17% 132 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.15
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19% Very poor
Lighting 29.8
Reflection 27.4
Parallax 30.6
24% 29.3 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 0.03
Splatting 0.09
9% 12.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 19%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
843GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 107 68 11 13 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 52
Write 45
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 47.4
35% 47.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.2
52% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 112%
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$70
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 77 85 97 93 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 61.5
Write 66.8
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 86.3
48% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
107% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3 1600 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
34.6% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 13.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.4
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 187
21% 187 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-A Builds (Compare 1,322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-A - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $313
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback