PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 304Bh |
Memory | 0.8 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110714 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 04 '19 at 22:44 |
Run Duration | 170 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 22% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5 660
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz
|
51.5%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Palit(1569 1381) 1GB
CLim: 1359 MHz, MLim: 1275 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
16.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 177 171 176 170 171 MB/s
|
61.1%
Good
|
|||
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
60GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 132 77 23 22 18 MB/s
|
56.5%
Above average
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
64GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 74 76 74 76 MB/s
|
44.5%
Average
|
|||
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$78
247GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 80 77 80 79 76 MB/s
|
44.5%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 198x |
Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 159x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 99x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 82x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 53x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 41x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 33x |
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 18x |
840 Pro 128GBSamsung $150Bench 90%, 34,842 samples | 11x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $98 |