HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 304Bh
Memory0.8 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110714
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 04 '19 at 22:44
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 660
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 69.3
1-Core 73.6
2-Core 141
56% 94.7 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 200
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Palit(1569 1381) 1GB
CLim: 1359 MHz, MLim: 1275 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 17.4
16% 17.9 fps
MRender 24
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 17.2
16% 20.3 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 177 171 176 170 171 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.1% Good
Read 221
Write 203
Mixed 201
SusWrite 170
45% 199 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 58.6
4K Mixed 31.8
106% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 42.6
74% 145 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
60GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 132 77 23 22 18 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.5% Above average
Read 222
Write 208
Mixed 199
SusWrite 65
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 32.8
112% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 44.5
75% 146 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 118%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
64GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 74 76 74 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 80.5
Write 81.3
Mixed 56
SusWrite 74.4
54% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$78
247GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 80 77 80 79 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 78
Write 78.7
Mixed 39
SusWrite 76.9
50% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:85 9B CT25664BA160B.C8F ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:85 9B CT25664BA160B.C8F 44GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 11.8
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7.1
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $98
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback