TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Guoshuo X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics98.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive11.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardGuoshuo X58  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '19 at 16:51
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3680-$180
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 94.4
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 163
69% 114 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 465
41% 350 Pts
64-Core 623
38% 623 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑
This bench: 68.8%
 Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Zotac(19DA 2445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 124
Parallax 117
103% 123 fps
MRender 98.9
Gravity 125
Splatting 106
90% 110 fps
Poor: 86% ↑
This bench: 98.8%
 Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Richdisk device 48GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 14 13 14 13 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 74.8
Write 51
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 13.6
11% 50 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 9
4K Mixed 8.1
24% 7.6 MB/s
DQ Read 8.8
DQ Write 8.8
DQ Mixed 9.1
7% 8.9 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑
This bench: 11.8%
 Great: 17%
Richdisk device 499GB
106GB free
Firmware: 1010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 14 13 14 13 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
8.51% Terrible
Read 54.2
Write 35.5
Mixed 50
SusWrite 13.6
9% 38.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 7.3
16% 4.67 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑
This bench: 8.51%
 Great: 15%
Richdisk device 628GB
205GB free
Firmware: 1010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 14 13 14 13 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
4.57% Terrible
Read 57
Write 38
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 13.6
8% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.9
4% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 4.57%
 Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MXIC 25L8005 41GB
1600, 33 MHz
8192, 33792 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.8% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 5.3
19% 6.67 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 7.3
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 58.7
68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 23.8%
 Great: 27%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical X58 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Guoshuo X58

CPU
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples4x
Core i7-920Intel  $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples4x
Xeon X5660IntelBench 71%, 6,950 samples3x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples5x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples3x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia  $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples3x
SSD
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples3x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples2x
512GB 512GBDogfishBench 70%, 457 samples2x
RAM
MXIC 25L8005 41GBUnknownBench 36%, 466 samples6x
KKX1866C10D3/8G MXIC 25L8005 41GBUnknownBench 39%, 6 samples3x
M393B1K70CH0-CH9 MXIC 25L8005 41GBSamsungBench 38%, 29 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $97
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback