Intel MAHOBAY

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive15.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel MAHOBAY  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 26 '19 at 06:59
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 57%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 89
2-Core 136
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 227
30% 226 Pts
64-Core 228
14% 228 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
EVGA(3842 6366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.3% Above average
Lighting 70.6
Reflection 72.5
Parallax 63.9
58% 69 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 68.5
Splatting 67.8
57% 69.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Richdisk device 48GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 15 15 15 15 14 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 77
Write 42
Mixed 69
SusWrite 15.4
11% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 10.7
37% 10.3 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 17%
Richdisk device 499GB
179GB free
Firmware: 1010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
4.54% Terrible
Read 63.3
Write 46.8
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 15.4
10% 44.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
4% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.54%
Great: 15%
Richdisk device 628GB
314GB free
Firmware: 1010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
5.21% Terrible
Read 49.5
Write 28.7
Mixed 45
SusWrite 15.4
8% 34.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 2.3
7% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.21%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-02X.B00LF 9905430-400.A00LF. 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 14.8
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 12.1
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAHOBAY Builds (Compare 784 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel MAHOBAY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback