Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190425
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 02 '19 at 01:34
Run Duration	270 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	65.5% Good	Memory 69.9 1-Core 76.1 2-Core 163 59% 103 Pts	4-Core 329 8-Core 588 55% 458 Pts	64-Core 1,038 64% 1,038 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Asus(1043 04BE) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1326 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.8.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	26.4% Poor	Lighting 31.7 Reflection 33 Parallax 44 26% 36.2 fps	MRender 32.2 Gravity 32.3 Splatting 35.7 28% 33.4 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB (2017)-$154 14,088 User benchmarks, average bench 131% 465GB free Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 357 356 358 358 358 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	89.4% Excellent	Read 518 Write 607 Mixed 417 SusWrite 370 108% 478 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 51.3 4K Mixed 31.9 107% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 260 DQ Write 319 DQ Mixed 293 220% 291 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 155%
SABRENT 1TB 693GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1866 964 983 981 987 973 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Asmt ASM1352R-Safe 4TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 3TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 170 165 163 160 162 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	99.7% Outstanding	Read 184 Write 119 Mixed 55.9 SusWrite 163 95% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 181% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 99.7% Great: 100%
Jmicron Disk 6TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 4TB free Firmware: 0106 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 85 99 88 87 89 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Read 104 Write 52.2 Mixed 26 SusWrite 88.3 49% 67.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 71% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 102%
Toshiba DT01ABA300 3TB 5,677 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2TB free Firmware: MZ6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 116 115 117 127 117 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	73.3% Very good	Read 138 Write 93.7 Mixed 18.8 SusWrite 118 66% 92.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.2 44% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 88%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79 133,734 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1TB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 96 101 78 77 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	34.3% Below average	Read 28.4 Write 81.1 Mixed 32 SusWrite 90.3 42% 58 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 110%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 1,602 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 3TB free, PID d011 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 134 125 126 125 129 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	Read 151 Write 121 Mixed 43.7 SusWrite 127 142% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40 653,654 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.7% Very good	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 25.6 MC Mixed 26.8 78% 27.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.8 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 18.8 57% 19.9 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,536 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	420x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	217x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	123x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $697

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)