Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$95 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	65.2% Good	Memory 68.9 1-Core 111 2-Core 210 72% 130 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 379 48% 365 Pts	64-Core 379 23% 379 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake) 153,031 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Elitegroup(1019 9C32) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	6.26% Terrible	Lighting 6.67 Reflection 9.15 Parallax 6.53 5% 7.45 fps	MRender 7.05 Gravity 5.9 Splatting 14 8% 8.97 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.26% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB 41,519 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30000P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 129 129 128 128 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	Read 295 Write 123 Mixed 124 SusWrite 128 37% 167 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 41.2 4K Mixed 12.7 74% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 327 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 117 115% 189 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 70%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 911GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 129 131 135 131 131 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	68% Good	Read 106 Write 151 Mixed 28.4 SusWrite 131 75% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.4 88% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB 22,600 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.1% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 9.7 26% 9.27 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 4.9 20% 7.07 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16