HP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1496
Memory4.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111110
Uptime14.7 Days
Run DateAug 31 '19 at 08:45
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 161
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 226
30% 224 Pts
64-Core 223
14% 223 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1496) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.04% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.42
Parallax 0.97
1% 1.16 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2
1% 1.55 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.04%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 244 268 253 236 229 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 460
Write 374
Mixed 335
SusWrite 258
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 34.9
114% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 223
203% 309 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 118%
BUFFALO HD-WLU3/R1 1 4TB
3TB free, PID 01ce
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 2.9 2.8 2.9 2.8 2.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 20
Mixed 22
SusWrite 2.8
23% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 96%
BUFFALO HD-WLU3/R1 2 1TB
931GB free, PID 01ce
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 23 23 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 19.6
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 22.5
31% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
38.7% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 11.3
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.4
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC Builds (Compare 278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback