Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H97-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 29 '19 at 13:08
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 203
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 383
51% 383 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
3.82% Terrible
Lighting 4.03
Reflection 7.96
Parallax 6.91
3% 6.3 fps
MRender 6.52
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.04
5% 5.68 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.82%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 30 35 49 65 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 52.7
Write 72.2
Mixed 51
SusWrite 46.6
41% 55.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 69%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$70
107GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 139 141 141 142 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 144
Write 125
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 141
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 113%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
294GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 88 87 87 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 92.8
Write 70.7
Mixed 77
SusWrite 87.2
61% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 67%
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$70
26GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 116 117 117 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
66% Good
Read 114
Write 113
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 116
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 66%
Great: 104%
WD Elements 2TB
28GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 37 34 37 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 31
Write 25.5
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 36.3
41% 29.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 44%
WD Elements 2TB
226GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 37 38 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 31
Write 28.5
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 37.4
42% 30.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19%
Great: 44%
WD My Book 1TB
94GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 41 41 40 41 42 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 32.3
Write 36.5
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 40.4
48% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Value DDR3 1600 C11 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
32.6% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 8.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 10.2
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $567
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback