Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte AX370-Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190506
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 23 '19 at 14:49
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 73
1-Core 102
2-Core 200
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 705
66% 549 Pts
64-Core 1,079
67% 1,079 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.7% Average
Lighting 63.1
Reflection 58.8
Parallax 74.8
51% 65.6 fps
MRender 62.2
Gravity 59.6
Splatting 50.6
46% 57.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NE-256 256GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0620A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 586 229 407 367 364 436 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,336
Write 830
Mixed 408
SusWrite 398
164% 743 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 42
183% 69.2 MB/s
DQ Read 722
DQ Write 635
DQ Mixed 521
434% 626 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 163%
Great: 234%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
300GB free
Firmware: 01.01S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 117 117 117 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 153
Write 136
Mixed 121
SusWrite 116
97% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PAD40830E16P1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.5% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 13.9
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 13.2
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 94.7
42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $510
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback