Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics79.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '19 at 23:09
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Memory 92.1
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 801
78% 642 Pts
64-Core 1,005
62% 1,005 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 91%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Gigabyte(1458 36CB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.8% Very good
Lighting 102
Reflection 109
Parallax 98.2
83% 103 fps
MRender 91.7
Gravity 95.9
Splatting 84.3
74% 90.6 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Z400s 256GB-$221
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2320000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 313 313 313 309 307 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 456
Write 307
Mixed 235
SusWrite 311
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 13.9
101% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 87.1
104% 178 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76%
Great: 84%
Asrock RAM Disk 0GB
0GB free
Firmware: 1.00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 6,191
Write 6,196
Mixed 6,029
1,373% 6,139 MB/s
4K Read 744
4K Write 680
4K Mixed 692
2,373% 705 MB/s
DQ Read 1,484
DQ Write 1,348
DQ Mixed 1,361
1,036% 1,398 MB/s
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 3TB-$79
2TB free
Firmware: CV27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 125 123 125 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 183
Write 183
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 125
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 114%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 3TB-$79
757GB free
Firmware: CV27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 145 144 142 145 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 158
Write 160
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 144
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 114%
ST325082 0AS 250GB
233GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 79 79 79 79 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.9% Below average
Read 77.3
Write 76.2
Mixed 44.1
SusWrite 79
93% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4-2400 CL16 8GB 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
73% Very good
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 23.6
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 21.6
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 820 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $768
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback