Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics80.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '19 at 22:31
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
61.5% Good
Memory 68.5
1-Core 74.8
2-Core 196
62% 113 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 602
52% 447 Pts
64-Core 851
53% 851 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Gigabyte(1458 36CB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.2% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 109
Parallax 98.6
84% 103 fps
MRender 91.7
Gravity 95.5
Splatting 84.4
74% 90.5 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Z400s 256GB-$221
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2320000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 314 307 303 309 306 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 452
Write 302
Mixed 217
SusWrite 309
71% 320 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 14.3
92% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 86.1
103% 175 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 84%
Asrock RAM Disk 0GB
0GB free
Firmware: 1.00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 4101
Write 3,899
Mixed 3,955
890% 3,985 MB/s
4K Read 414
4K Write 405
4K Mixed 400
1,354% 406 MB/s
DQ Read 1,264
DQ Write 1,162
DQ Mixed 1193
901% 1,206 MB/s
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 3TB-$79
2TB free
Firmware: CV27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 122 126 127 125 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 188
Write 178
Mixed 86.6
SusWrite 125
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 114%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 3TB-$79
757GB free
Firmware: CV27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 145 144 144 146 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 168
Write 160
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 145
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 114%
ST325082 0AS 250GB
233GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 78 80 79 79 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.2% Below average
Read 77.1
Write 78.2
Mixed 43
SusWrite 78.9
93% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4-2400 CL16 8GB 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
63.4% Good
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 23.8
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.4
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 820 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $768
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback