Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '19 at 23:02
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 90.3
2-Core 155
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 485
49% 398 Pts
64-Core 851
53% 851 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Gigabyte(1458 36CB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.5% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 109
Parallax 108
84% 107 fps
MRender 92
Gravity 95.5
Splatting 86.9
74% 91.5 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Z400s 256GB-$221
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2320000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 313 309 312 310 308 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 459
Write 245
Mixed 210
SusWrite 311
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 14.6
93% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 84.7
102% 174 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74%
Great: 84%
Asrock RAM Disk 0GB
0GB free
Firmware: 1.00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 6,138
Write 6,156
Mixed 6,003
1,364% 6,099 MB/s
4K Read 718
4K Write 671
4K Mixed 674
2,307% 688 MB/s
DQ Read 1,486
DQ Write 1,342
DQ Mixed 1,360
1,035% 1,396 MB/s
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 3TB-$79
2TB free
Firmware: CV27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 123 126 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 181
Write 185
Mixed 86.9
SusWrite 125
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 114%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 3TB-$79
757GB free
Firmware: CV27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 142 146 146 147 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 164
Write 158
Mixed 75.1
SusWrite 145
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 114%
ST325082 0AS 250GB
233GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 79 79 79 79 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.6% Below average
Read 77.6
Write 76.6
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 79
92% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4-2400 CL16 8GB 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.5% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 22.1
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 20.2
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 820 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $768
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback