Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N450 2,527 User benchmarks, average bench 20% CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	23% Poor	Memory 44.7 1-Core 6.6 2-Core 11 18% 20.8 Pts	4-Core 10.5 8-Core 11 1% 10.8 Pts	64-Core 11.7 1% 11.7 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 206GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6C SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 103 102 101 100 MB/s Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.1% Below average	Read 219 Write 102 Mixed 137 SusWrite 102 31% 140 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 26.4 4K Mixed 15.7 66% 21 MB/s	DQ Read 53.2 DQ Write 47.5 DQ Mixed 44.9 35% 48.5 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 92%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 32GB-$8 9,864 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 28GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 9.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Read 25.3 Write 18.5 Mixed 20.9 SusWrite 17.2 27% 20.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 2.6 192% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown EBE10UE8AFSA-8G-F 1x1GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 1 of 1 slots used 1GB SODIMM DDR2 667 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	8.91% Terrible	MC Read 2.9 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 2.4 8% 2.73 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 2 7% 2.3 GB/s	Latency 182 22% 182 ns
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 8.91% Great: 9%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16