Asus H61M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H61M-A  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140624
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '19 at 16:34
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570S
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 102
2-Core 200
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 380
50% 375 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.82% Terrible
Lighting 1.87
Reflection 1.85
Parallax 1.41
2% 1.71 fps
MRender 3.76
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.65
2% 2.85 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.82%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 81 85 87 86 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 115
Write 107
Mixed 120
SusWrite 83.5
24% 106 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 25.1
85% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 97.2
DQ Mixed 96.5
76% 106 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 73%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
122GB free
Firmware: GF100-07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 75 75 75 74 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 61.7
Write 66.4
Mixed 40.6
SusWrite 73.6
44% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RM25664BA1339.8FR 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.3
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-A Builds (Compare 225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $86
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback