Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '19 at 14:37
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 74%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$275
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 81.7
1-Core 147
2-Core 284
93% 171 Pts
4-Core 553
8-Core 880
88% 716 Pts
64-Core 1,352
84% 1,352 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Asus(1043 8660) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 128
Parallax 138
112% 134 fps
MRender 148
Gravity 121
Splatting 91.9
95% 120 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 105%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
768GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 326 364 412 411 410 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 405
Write 369
Mixed 450
SusWrite 366
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 45.5
152% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 307
231% 310 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 133%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 292 37 5 5.3 5.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 254
Write 287
Mixed 299
SusWrite 95.3
53% 234 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 17.3
74% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 31.7
58% 112 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
928GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 158 157 156 153 154 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
HGST 1TB
295GB free, PID 1014
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 91 91 93 93 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 69.7
Write 72.8
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 91.1
88% 65.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 33.3
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 30.6
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,616 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $895
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback