Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	91.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 4,306 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Memory 52.7 1-Core 71.1 2-Core 172 53% 98.6 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 600 55% 462 Pts	64-Core 1,581 98% 1,581 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 570 3,798 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Dell(1028 1702) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.7.5 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Lighting 36 Reflection 61.5 Parallax 51 29% 49.5 fps	MRender 60.5 Gravity 37.6 Splatting 50.9 41% 49.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 34%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 793GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 428 423 421 430 431 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	91.2% Outstanding	Read 466 Write 448 Mixed 436 SusWrite 428 100% 444 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 37 4K Mixed 30 98% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 346 262% 352 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 133%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB 74,123 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 931GB free Firmware: 401000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 429 424 432 432 433 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Read 468 Write 445 Mixed 380 SusWrite 430 97% 431 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 41.3 4K Mixed 28.2 96% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 258 212% 303 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 117%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$96 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 931GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1784 1855 1675 1529 1533 1540 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	245% Outstanding	Read 1,970 Write 1761 Mixed 1,620 SusWrite 1,653 394% 1,751 MB/s	4K Read 37.5 4K Write 67.2 4K Mixed 47.1 153% 50.6 MB/s	DQ Read 487 DQ Write 303 DQ Mixed 440 316% 410 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 245% Great: 410%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT8GC72B4NB1NK-CG NT8GC72B4NB1NK-CG NT8GC72B4NB1NK-CG NT8GC72B4NB1NK-CG NT8GC72B4NB1NK-CG NT8GC72B4NB1NK-CG NT8GC72B4NB1NK-CG NT8GC72B4NB1NK-CG NT8GC72B4NB1NK-CG NT8GC72B4NB1NK-C... 96GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	MC Read 32.1 MC Write 31.7 MC Mixed 27.7 87% 30.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6 22% 7.63 GB/s	Latency 151 26% 151 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 99%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	150x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	147x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	129x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	170x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	113x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	95x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	72x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	60x

RAM
9965525-138.A00LF 12x8GBKingstonBench 111%, 25 samples	24x
18JDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 8x8GBMicronBench 97%, 23 samples	20x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	18x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $345

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16