Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 151%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics159% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS ULTRA
MotherboardGigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra  (all builds)
Memory59.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '19 at 14:16
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$260
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Memory 87.4
1-Core 149
2-Core 299
97% 178 Pts
4-Core 597
8-Core 1,174
105% 886 Pts
64-Core 1,176
73% 1,176 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 1E04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
159% Outstanding
Lighting 217
Reflection 230
Parallax 241
177% 229 fps
MRender 270
Gravity 218
Splatting 145
165% 211 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 159%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HUA721010KLA330 240GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 100 94 88 98 90 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 434
Write 265
Mixed 300
SusWrite 113
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 89.1
4K Mixed 35
130% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 186
169% 258 MB/s
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
99GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,561
Write 2343
Mixed 1,350
462% 2,085 MB/s
4K Read 70.2
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 95.3
328% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,865
DQ Write 1,489
DQ Mixed 1,610
1,223% 1,655 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB
408GB free
Firmware: GKAOA94A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 78 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 43.8
Write 44.7
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 78.5
36% 49.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 47%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB
105GB free
Firmware: GKAOA94A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 60 61 61 62 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 57.7
Write 57.2
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 61.1
41% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 47%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 88 92 91 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 89.5
Write 90.3
Mixed 85
SusWrite 89
66% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 77%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 16GB
2GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 20 19 20 19 20 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 89.5
Write 20.2
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 19.2
42% 39.6 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 4.2
282% 5.97 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU32GX4M2C3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.1% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 23.9
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 22.8
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ULTRA-CF Builds (Compare 7,742 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra - $172

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,227
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback