Asus M5A78L-M/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M/USB3  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131112
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 09 '19 at 10:19
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4300-$73
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 86.4
1-Core 65.9
2-Core 118
57% 89.9 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 198
25% 191 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Asus(1043 0511) 2GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.7.5
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 18.3
Reflection 30.5
Parallax 21.6
15% 23.5 fps
MRender 29
Gravity 15.9
Splatting 34.3
22% 26.4 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 93 91 72 43 33 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.9% Average
Read 219
Write 205
Mixed 190
SusWrite 69.3
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 33.5
108% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 32.5
DQ Write 64
DQ Mixed 39.1
32% 45.2 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
198GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 94 92 73 43 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 91.5
Write 98.5
Mixed 49
SusWrite 69.6
57% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 0.5
207% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 114%
Corsair Force GT 250GB
227GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 67 67 67 69 69 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.8% Below average
Read 65.5
Write 33.8
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 66
39% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 39%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 68 67 67 69 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 169
Write 166
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 66.1
76% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.6% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 16
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.2
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A78L-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback