TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory59.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '19 at 16:03
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.75 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Memory 90.1
1-Core 123
2-Core 247
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 981
87% 737 Pts
64-Core 1,357
84% 1,357 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑
This bench: 91%
 Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon-VII-$841
AMD(1002 081E)
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 19.7.5
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 111
Parallax 219
107% 154 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 151
Splatting 160
118% 142 fps
Poor: 91% ↑
This bench: 109%
 Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 139 133 134 132 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 301
Write 183
Mixed 185
SusWrite 152
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 42.5
4K Mixed 23.1
96% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 42.8
DQ Write 45.5
DQ Mixed 40.9
32% 43.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 52.4%
 Great: 85%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
730GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 103 106 106 107 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 111
Write 78.7
Mixed 65.1
SusWrite 106
66% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 62.4%
 Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
111% Outstanding
MC Read 41.5
MC Write 40.1
MC Mixed 38
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 43.6
SC Mixed 35.3
102% 35.9 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 88% ↑
This bench: 111%
 Great: 191%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD  $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples144x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD  $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples43x
Ryzen TR 1900XAMD  $110Bench 76%, 7,071 samples33x
GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples49x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia  $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples13x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples12x
SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples10x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $140Bench 213%, 165,668 samples10x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples9x
RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL  $129Bench 91%, 87,239 samples10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 86%, 3,127 samples7x
CMU64GX4M4C3000C15 4x16GBCorsairBench 97%, 731 samples4x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $998
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback