Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory60.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '19 at 18:53
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 63.1
1-Core 124
2-Core 237
76% 141 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 912
81% 687 Pts
64-Core 2,430
150% 2,430 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon-VII-$841
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 19.6.3
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 96.4
Parallax 200
104% 141 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 148
Splatting 144
110% 132 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 131 130 128 131 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 396
Write 166
Mixed 200
SusWrite 148
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 23.7
96% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 48.6
DQ Write 46.9
DQ Mixed 45
34% 46.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56%
Great: 85%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
734GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 106 105 104 107 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 102
Write 102
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 104
70% 95 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 84%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
3GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.3 3.5 3.7 3.1 4.3 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 33.3
Write 7.5
Mixed 7.3
SusWrite 3.6
13% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.5
155% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 51.7
MC Write 54.2
MC Mixed 50
148% 52 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 31.2
SC Mixed 22.1
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 130%
Great: 191%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $998
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback