Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory59.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190305
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateJul 06 '19 at 09:35
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.75 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 87.4
1-Core 115
2-Core 230
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 796
76% 625 Pts
64-Core 1,283
79% 1,283 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 86%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon-VII-$841
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 19.6.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 100
Parallax 197
109% 144 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 148
Splatting 145
110% 133 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 108%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 117 121 122 118 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 363
Write 153
Mixed 160
SusWrite 135
45% 203 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 20.4
80% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 43.3
DQ Write 45.3
DQ Mixed 40.9
32% 43.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 85%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
734GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 106 106 106 107 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 110
Write 96.5
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 105
67% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
108% Outstanding
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 36.5
110% 38.6 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 43
SC Mixed 33.3
98% 34.3 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 108%
Great: 191%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $998
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback