Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X99P-SLI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99P-SLI-CF  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160613
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 20 '16 at 19:32
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$90
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 197
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 707
65% 543 Pts
64-Core 913
56% 913 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5906
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
29% Poor
Lighting 36.4
Reflection 35.4
Parallax 31.1
30% 34.3 fps
MRender 36.5
Gravity 32.4
Splatting 33.5
28% 34.1 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 1,371
Write 928
Mixed 1,007
244% 1,102 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 24.3
177% 69.5 MB/s
DQ Read 41.8
DQ Write 63.5
DQ Mixed 23.2
26% 42.9 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 165%
Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
108GB free
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 509
Write 405
Mixed 417
99% 444 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 20.8
120% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 39.8
DQ Write 62.9
DQ Mixed 20.6
24% 41.1 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 115%
WD WD5000AAKS-00A7B 500GB
248GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 82.9
Write 79.6
Mixed 80.5
61% 81 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 2.21
4K Mixed 0.38
113% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 63%
WD WD5000AAKS-00A7B 500GB
279GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 68.9
Write 65.7
Mixed 67.2
51% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.17
4K Mixed 0.38
112% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 22.7
74% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 17.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99P-SLI-CF Builds (Compare 332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99P-SLI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $468
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback