Gigabyte GA-X99P-SLI-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99P-SLI-CF (all builds)
Memory	28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160613
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 20 '16 at 19:16
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103 50,196 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	76.2% Very good	Memory 87.8 1-Core 110 2-Core 193 76% 130 Pts	4-Core 347 8-Core 712 62% 530 Pts	64-Core 902 56% 902 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 8554) Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5906 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	29% Poor	Lighting 36.4 Reflection 35.4 Parallax 31.1 30% 34.3 fps	MRender 36.3 Gravity 32.5 Splatting 33.4 28% 34.1 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 152GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	163% Outstanding	Read 1,370 Write 920 Mixed 1,001 243% 1,097 MB/s	4K Read 51.2 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 25.2 173% 65.4 MB/s	DQ Read 44.6 DQ Write 66.9 DQ Mixed 23.2 27% 44.9 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 163% Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 108GB free Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 123 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 117 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 50 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 18 (F1) Unknown 99 99 351492055	83% Excellent	Read 509 Write 407 Mixed 417 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 40.3 4K Write 65.8 4K Mixed 20.6 122% 42.2 MB/s	DQ Read 30.8 DQ Write 64.7 DQ Mixed 18.5 22% 38 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 115%
WD WD5000AAKS-00A7B 500GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 248GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1042 (03) Spinup time 161 159 4925 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2706 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 11977 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2656 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 525 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2706 (C2) HDA temperature 114 97 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 3 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	44.2% Average	Read 79.9 Write 73.6 Mixed 79.6 59% 77.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 2.23 4K Mixed 0.4 112% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 63%
WD WD5000AAKS-00A7B 500GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 279GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 161 161 4908 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2290 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 11953 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2248 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 119 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2290 (C2) HDA temperature 114 96 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	38.7% Below average	Read 68.2 Write 66.2 Mixed 67.1 51% 67.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 2.15 4K Mixed 0.37 109% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GB 8,488 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	69.3% Good	MC Read 29.3 MC Write 25 MC Mixed 22.6 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 16 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99P-SLI-CF Builds (Compare 319 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 70%

Battleship

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 63%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99P-SLI-CF

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	111x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	61x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	37x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	35x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	22x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $99Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	16x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	12x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $330Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	11x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 4x8GBUnknownBench 87%, 1,963 samples	14x
HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 90%, 782 samples	10x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 82%, 1,079 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $480

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16