Gigabyte GA-X99P-SLI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99P-SLI-CF  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '16 at 18:30
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 89.6
1-Core 114
2-Core 213
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 696
69% 565 Pts
64-Core 910
56% 910 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5906
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
29% Poor
Lighting 36.3
Reflection 35.4
Parallax 34.7
30% 35.5 fps
MRender 36.3
Gravity 32.7
Splatting 33.4
28% 34.1 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 1,348
Write 922
Mixed 1,001
242% 1,090 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 84.9
4K Mixed 25
150% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 38.5
DQ Write 58.5
DQ Mixed 22
24% 39.6 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 156%
Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
108GB free
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 512
Write 407
Mixed 417
99% 445 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 20.3
126% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 31.2
DQ Write 60.6
DQ Mixed 19.1
22% 37 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 115%
WD WD5000AAKS-00A7B 500GB
248GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 82.9
Write 75.2
Mixed 73.5
58% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.37
106% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 63%
WD WD5000AAKS-00A7B 500GB
279GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 68.9
Write 66.5
Mixed 66.5
51% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 0.35
108% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.6% Good
MC Read 29
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 22.4
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 17.4
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99P-SLI-CF Builds (Compare 319 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99P-SLI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $480
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback