Notebook N/A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics78.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemNotebook N/A  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P65_67RSRP
Memory13.5 GB free of 16.0156 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160713
Uptime3 Days
Run DateAug 01 '19 at 23:45
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 108
2-Core 202
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 549
56% 454 Pts
64-Core 541
34% 541 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 6A03) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3086
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Lighting 99.7
Reflection 110
Parallax 94
81% 101 fps
MRender 87
Gravity 86.7
Splatting 89.8
72% 87.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 421 331 246 248 249 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 412
Write 375
Mixed 346
SusWrite 301
81% 358 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 80.7
4K Mixed 37.8
125% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 307
231% 310 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 98%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
819GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 127 132 131 133 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 149
Write 135
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 130
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GigaDevice 25Q Series 029E CMSX16GX4M2A2666C18 029E CMSX16GX4M2A2666C18 64GB
0, 2667, 2667 MHz
49152, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 24
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 26.5
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N/A Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

System: Notebook N/A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback