Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics64.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateAug 01 '19 at 16:23
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 98.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 241
88% 154 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 614
67% 530 Pts
64-Core 620
38% 620 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-$199
CLim: 1100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.8% Good
Lighting 81.9
Reflection 59.9
Parallax 114
67% 85.1 fps
MRender 61.2
Gravity 82.2
Splatting 78.2
61% 73.9 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 245 162 160 160 161 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 457
Mixed 382
SusWrite 214
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 44.8
167% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 368
277% 371 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 100%
Great: 134%
WDC WD20 EARS-00J2GB0 2TB
135GB free, PID 0277
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 27 27 26 26 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.39% Terrible
Read 20
Write 17.8
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 26.2
26% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
16% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.39%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2933 C12 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.8% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 24.8
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 24.7
66% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 43.9
91% 43.9 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V FORMULA Builds (Compare 715 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $880
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback