Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA

Performance Results


Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	63.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130819
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 02 '18 at 18:09
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Memory 98.5 1-Core 118 2-Core 201 82% 139 Pts	4-Core 378 8-Core 562 58% 470 Pts	64-Core 619 38% 619 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-$199 18,014 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Sapphire(174B E331) CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.9.2 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Lighting 81.8 Reflection 57.8 Parallax 110 67% 83.4 fps	MRender 58.6 Gravity 78.9 Splatting 74.7 58% 70.7 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 317GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 453 462 463 465 466 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 504 Write 484 Mixed 411 SusWrite 453 104% 463 MB/s	4K Read 34.8 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 41.9 160% 59.1 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 354 DQ Mixed 367 276% 370 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 134%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 26GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 69.5 Write 71 Mixed 46.2 46% 62.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 51%
WDC WD20 EARS-00J2GB0 2TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 151GB free, PID 0277 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 33 32 31 32 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.5% Very poor	Read 33.8 Write 22.4 Mixed 17.6 SusWrite 31.3 34% 26.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 16% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2933 C12 4x4GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1800 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	78% Very good	MC Read 26.4 MC Write 29.2 MC Mixed 24.1 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 23.2 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 25.4 67% 23.6 GB/s	Latency 43.4 92% 43.4 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS V FORMULA Builds (Compare 713 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 59%

Gunboat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 49%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA - $349

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	399x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	105x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	63x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	58x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	56x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	30x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	24x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	20x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	19x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $890

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16