Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics82.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 28 '19 at 22:19
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$90
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 97.3
1-Core 125
2-Core 213
85% 145 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 662
60% 502 Pts
64-Core 911
56% 911 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
CLim: 1622 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.20.17.01
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Lighting 98.2
Reflection 87.8
Parallax 151
80% 112 fps
MRender 86.8
Gravity 104
Splatting 124
88% 105 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 85%
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 2765) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Lighting 32.4
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 37.7
26% 33.4 fps
MRender 41.2
Gravity 40
Splatting 33.6
31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 512GB
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 802 799 802 808 806 807 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 1,128
Write 861
Mixed 426
SusWrite 804
180% 805 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 43.9
172% 67.9 MB/s
DQ Read 473
DQ Write 434
DQ Mixed 259
248% 389 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 167%
Great: 332%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
582GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2218 2166 1454 1471 1481 1477 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 2,527
Write 2116
Mixed 1,836
SusWrite 1,711
459% 2,048 MB/s
4K Read 60.1
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 80.8
260% 88 MB/s
DQ Read 705
DQ Write 611
DQ Mixed 657
492% 657 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 316%
Great: 410%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
477GB free
Firmware: EXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 344 347 345 348 345 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 370
Write 356
Mixed 326
SusWrite 346
79% 349 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 37.8
125% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 213
148% 186 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 124%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
1TB free
Firmware: 0003HPM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 94 93 95 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 90.7
Write 88.5
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 93.1
59% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 2666 C11 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
137% Outstanding
MC Read 52.8
MC Write 57.8
MC Mixed 52.1
155% 54.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 49.2
81% 49.2 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 137%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION Builds (Compare 681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $421
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback