Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3P  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141229
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 28 '19 at 12:18
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$55
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 75.3
2-Core 148
65% 106 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 339
38% 297 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (63 fps cap detected)
51.2% Above average
Lighting 62.6
Reflection 62.7
Parallax 54.9
51% 60 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 60.6
Splatting 64
52% 62.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1C3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 141 36 51 29 49 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.2% Poor
Read 194
Write 89.5
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 78
24% 110 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 19
4K Mixed 10.2
43% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 13.3
DQ Write 15.4
DQ Mixed 13.7
10% 14.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 102%
Team T2535T240G 240GB
147GB free
Firmware: R0412A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 46 55 56 56 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 487
Write 412
Mixed 36.2
SusWrite 75.9
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 29.6
106% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 1.4
56% 132 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 93%
Crucial MTFDDAV256TBN-1AR15ABHA 256GB
71GB free
Firmware: HPC0T12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 403 432 418 402 404 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 423
Write 151
Mixed 283
SusWrite 395
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 19
103% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 263
191% 246 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
397GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 138 136 139 139 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 164
Mixed 110
SusWrite 137
109% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.3
250% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6AFR8A HMT351U6CFR8C RMR5040ED58E9 16GB
800, 800, 800 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
48.1% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 16.3
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 14.2
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-DS3P Builds (Compare 3,205 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback