HP EliteBook 840 G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP EliteBook 840 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83B2
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220113
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateMay 23 '22 at 12:12
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
46.9% Average
Memory 61.8
1-Core 54.4
2-Core 112
46% 76 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 215
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 83B2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.29% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 5
4% 4.6 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 4
Splatting 9.7
6% 6.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.29%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAV256TBN-1AR15ABHA 256GB
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPC0T14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 236 245 254 137 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 376
Write 337
Mixed 263
SusWrite 205
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 26.8
4K Mixed 15.7
53% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 273
196% 248 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.3% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 21
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 840 G5 Builds (Compare 3,911 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 840 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback